<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murtha Unaware of Consequences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.longren.org/murtha-unaware-of-consequences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.longren.org/murtha-unaware-of-consequences/</link>
	<description>Certified &#38; Decorated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 19:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aakash</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/murtha-unaware-of-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-9613</link>
		<dc:creator>Aakash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2097#comment-9613</guid>
		<description>I think that Congressman Murtha is &quot;aware&quot; of a lot more than you guys are giving him credit for.

He supported the Iraq war (and from what I&#039;ve seen, I don&#039;t see any evidence that his support was insincere), and now, like many pro-war Democrats &lt;b&gt;and pro-war Republicans&lt;/b&gt;, he is having second thoughts.  Barry Campbell&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://gmapalumni.org/chapomatic/?p=1331#comment-12993&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comment post&lt;/a&gt; is appropriate.

However, regarding the issue of our current policy in Iraq, the arguments that people are making, in favor of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haloscan.com/comments/uber/113267155908775441&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;liberal internationalism&lt;/a&gt; that our government is engaged in, &lt;a href=&quot;http://uis.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_uis_archive.html#106654400022029878&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in Iraq&lt;/a&gt;, Bosnia, Kosovo, etc... - those are statist arguments... the same kind that liberals made against the 1996 welfare reform bill, and the same kind that Al Gore and the liberal Democrats made against George W. Bush in 2000, regarding now-President Bush&#039;s desire to withdraw troops from foreign operations, and end nation-building. The liberal internationalist foreign policy agenda in Iraq &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/duncan09.10.03.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;needs to end&lt;/a&gt;, and we need to pursue the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acuf.org/principles/p_foreign.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more conservative foreign policy&lt;/a&gt; that George W. Bush initially got elected upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Congressman Murtha is &#8220;aware&#8221; of a lot more than you guys are giving him credit for.</p>
<p>He supported the Iraq war (and from what I&#8217;ve seen, I don&#8217;t see any evidence that his support was insincere), and now, like many pro-war Democrats <b>and pro-war Republicans</b>, he is having second thoughts.  Barry Campbell&#8217;s <a href="http://gmapalumni.org/chapomatic/?p=1331#comment-12993" rel="nofollow">comment post</a> is appropriate.</p>
<p>However, regarding the issue of our current policy in Iraq, the arguments that people are making, in favor of the <a href="http://www.haloscan.com/comments/uber/113267155908775441" rel="nofollow">liberal internationalism</a> that our government is engaged in, <a href="http://uis.blogspot.com/2003_10_01_uis_archive.html#106654400022029878" rel="nofollow">in Iraq</a>, Bosnia, Kosovo, etc&#8230; &#8211; those are statist arguments&#8230; the same kind that liberals made against the 1996 welfare reform bill, and the same kind that Al Gore and the liberal Democrats made against George W. Bush in 2000, regarding now-President Bush&#8217;s desire to withdraw troops from foreign operations, and end nation-building. The liberal internationalist foreign policy agenda in Iraq <a href="http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/duncan09.10.03.htm" rel="nofollow">needs to end</a>, and we need to pursue the <a href="http://www.acuf.org/principles/p_foreign.asp" rel="nofollow">more conservative foreign policy</a> that George W. Bush initially got elected upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/murtha-unaware-of-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-9448</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2097#comment-9448</guid>
		<description>The continued troop presence in Iraq will help ensure a totally self contained democracy.  Iraq hasn&#039;t even voted on a permenant government yet.  That&#039;ll happen in a little less than a month.

Talking about leaving before they&#039;ve even got a permenant government in place is insane.  The job isn&#039;t done, it&#039;s that simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The continued troop presence in Iraq will help ensure a totally self contained democracy.  Iraq hasn&#8217;t even voted on a permenant government yet.  That&#8217;ll happen in a little less than a month.</p>
<p>Talking about leaving before they&#8217;ve even got a permenant government in place is insane.  The job isn&#8217;t done, it&#8217;s that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan M. Chesmer</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/murtha-unaware-of-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-9348</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan M. Chesmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2097#comment-9348</guid>
		<description>I have a question for everyone.

What more can be accomplished with the continued presence in Iraq at the current troop levels?

Also, what&#039;s your view of when the Iraqis will be able to handle things on their own?

Note: To left &amp; right extremists - I would like some civilized discussion on this, not the same old rhetoric from either side ;-)

Thanks in advance to all who respond!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for everyone.</p>
<p>What more can be accomplished with the continued presence in Iraq at the current troop levels?</p>
<p>Also, what&#8217;s your view of when the Iraqis will be able to handle things on their own?</p>
<p>Note: To left &amp; right extremists &#8211; I would like some civilized discussion on this, not the same old rhetoric from either side ;-)</p>
<p>Thanks in advance to all who respond!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eternalhope.blog-city.com</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/murtha-unaware-of-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-9209</link>
		<dc:creator>eternalhope.blog-city.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2097#comment-9209</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Around the blogs: Discussing the John Murtha speech.&lt;/strong&gt;

The Washington Post has picked up Congressman John Murtha&#039;s remarks and reports that he is backed by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelsoi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Around the blogs: Discussing the John Murtha speech.</strong></p>
<p>The Washington Post has picked up Congressman John Murtha&#8217;s remarks and reports that he is backed by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelsoi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/murtha-unaware-of-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-9195</link>
		<dc:creator>john ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 04:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2097#comment-9195</guid>
		<description>I think the figure of 7300 wounded is not accurate. That is only 3.5 times the rate of KIA.Here is a link to Stars and Stripes  that says that 20,000 were treated at a hospital in Germany. Understating the amount of wounded does a grave disservice to all in uniform.    http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&amp;article=24783&amp;archive=true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the figure of 7300 wounded is not accurate. That is only 3.5 times the rate of KIA.Here is a link to Stars and Stripes  that says that 20,000 were treated at a hospital in Germany. Understating the amount of wounded does a grave disservice to all in uniform.    <a href="http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&#038;article=24783&#038;archive=true" rel="nofollow">http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&#038;article=24783&#038;archive=true</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/murtha-unaware-of-consequences/comment-page-1/#comment-9191</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 03:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2097#comment-9191</guid>
		<description>Great blog here &amp; thanks for linking to my CalCon post. 

I couldn&#039;t agree more wholeheartedly with you that Murtha isn&#039;t &quot;just some generic liberal hippie douche bag speaking of what he doesn’t know.&quot; Still, that doesn&#039;t qualify him as a military expert, either. 

He hasn&#039;t been charged with developing a war plan for even a minor skirmish in Iraq. He didn&#039;t offer a single instance to point to why we need to get out of Iraq. He couldn&#039;t say this to the military now serving in Iraq without getting booed off the stage. 

In short, his views don&#039;t represent those of the vast majority of the military serving in Iraq &amp; I hope (and I know) they never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog here &amp; thanks for linking to my CalCon post. </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more wholeheartedly with you that Murtha isn&#8217;t &#8220;just some generic liberal hippie douche bag speaking of what he doesn’t know.&#8221; Still, that doesn&#8217;t qualify him as a military expert, either. </p>
<p>He hasn&#8217;t been charged with developing a war plan for even a minor skirmish in Iraq. He didn&#8217;t offer a single instance to point to why we need to get out of Iraq. He couldn&#8217;t say this to the military now serving in Iraq without getting booed off the stage. </p>
<p>In short, his views don&#8217;t represent those of the vast majority of the military serving in Iraq &amp; I hope (and I know) they never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

