Comments on: Bush Bites Back http://www.longren.org/bush-bites-back/ Certified & Decorated Sat, 05 May 2012 19:31:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: xanax online http://www.longren.org/bush-bites-back/comment-page-1/#comment-47148 xanax online Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:03:56 +0000 http://www.longren.org/?p=2088#comment-47148 <strong>xanax online...</strong> news... xanax online…

news…

]]> By: New Trommetter Times http://www.longren.org/bush-bites-back/comment-page-1/#comment-9083 New Trommetter Times Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:13:56 +0000 http://www.longren.org/?p=2088#comment-9083 <strong>Democrats Rewriting History</strong> President Bush shot back at his critics in his Veteran’s Day speech. Well put, Mr. President. What took you so long? Democrats Rewriting History

President Bush shot back at his critics in his Veteran’s Day speech. Well put, Mr. President. What took you so long?

]]> By: Follow the Evidence - Amy Proctor http://www.longren.org/bush-bites-back/comment-page-1/#comment-9051 Follow the Evidence - Amy Proctor Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:46:34 +0000 http://www.longren.org/?p=2088#comment-9051 <strong>Pres. Bush defends his postion on Iraq</strong> Finally the President has decided to stop being roadkill. In his attempt to be bipartisan and a compassionate conservative, he has allowed lies of the worst sort to go virtually unchallenged against him by disingenuous opponents. Sincere opponents us... Pres. Bush defends his postion on Iraq

Finally the President has decided to stop being roadkill. In his attempt to be bipartisan and a compassionate conservative, he has allowed lies of the worst sort to go virtually unchallenged against him by disingenuous opponents. Sincere opponents us…

]]> By: Chris Bordeman http://www.longren.org/bush-bites-back/comment-page-1/#comment-8965 Chris Bordeman Sat, 12 Nov 2005 07:26:50 +0000 http://www.longren.org/?p=2088#comment-8965 I see this "Free Frank Warner" fellow is going around making the identical "talking point" post to several blogs! What's the matter, no thoughts of your own? It's not even a good post. Saying that most dems voted for the war because WMD says NOTHING about the motivations of the rest, much less the president, a logic flaw only an idiot or a DemocRAT would miss. Of course those same dems were claiming in speeches and elsewhere long before the war (and even before Bush took office) that Saddam had WMD. In fact not ONE elected DemocRAT publicly questioned that conclusion before the war. I see this “Free Frank Warner” fellow is going around making the identical “talking point” post to several blogs! What’s the matter, no thoughts of your own?

It’s not even a good post. Saying that most dems voted for the war because WMD says NOTHING about the motivations of the rest, much less the president, a logic flaw only an idiot or a DemocRAT would miss. Of course those same dems were claiming in speeches and elsewhere long before the war (and even before Bush took office) that Saddam had WMD. In fact not ONE elected DemocRAT publicly questioned that conclusion before the war.

]]> By: Free Frank Warner http://www.longren.org/bush-bites-back/comment-page-1/#comment-8964 Free Frank Warner Sat, 12 Nov 2005 05:17:05 +0000 http://www.longren.org/?p=2088#comment-8964 Bush made one big mistake in today’s speech. He accidentally said Saddam’s possession of WMDs was the only reason for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. He said the Democrats in Congress had seen the same intelligence he had seen on Saddam having WMDs, and “<a href="http://frankwarner.typepad.com/free_frank_warner/2005/11/president_bush_.html" rel="nofollow">THAT’S WHY</a>” they voted to support removing Saddam from power. <i>That’s why?</i> That’s it? How about ending Saddam’s repression? How about creating a democracy? How about stopping Saddam’s support for terrorists? How about punishing Saddam’s failure to return Kuwaiti POWs? How about Saddam’s failure to cooperate with the arms inspectors? Whoever wrote that speech was a little too sloppy. Bush made one big mistake in today’s speech. He accidentally said Saddam’s possession of WMDs was the only reason for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

He said the Democrats in Congress had seen the same intelligence he had seen on Saddam having WMDs, and “THAT’S WHY” they voted to support removing Saddam from power. That’s why? That’s it?

How about ending Saddam’s repression? How about creating a democracy? How about stopping Saddam’s support for terrorists? How about punishing Saddam’s failure to return Kuwaiti POWs? How about Saddam’s failure to cooperate with the arms inspectors?

Whoever wrote that speech was a little too sloppy.

]]>