Stop the ACLU has news of a “boy love” blog that’s being hosted by google. This sick fuck of a blogger thinks little boys are his sexual play things. Well, he may not think that precisely, but he might as well. This is from Wordlnet Daily:
A marriage and family therapist is trying to convince Google to drop a website from its popular, free blog host that promotes “boy love,” sexual relationships between men and adolescents.
Stacy L. Harp of Orange, Calif., told WorldNetDaily one of the readers of her weblog pointed out the site, called “Paiderastia: The Boy Love Revival.”
At the top of its homepage, the site explains it’s all about “erotic/mentor/spiritual love between adolescents and adults.”
Harp said, however, that not long after she exposed it yesterday morning, the “Paiderastia” site removed its most recent posts, including one dated April 9.
Also removed, according to Harp, was a podcast – a file with a radio-style report – that mocked the FBI. It was created through the podcast provider Liberated Syndication.
Here’s a bit from the blog itself, at least this asshat realizes he doesn’t have “right” to make love to boys.
I just now got around to reading the post that included the Boylove Code of Ethics, and I really really like this Code of Ethics. These things are very important, and more of us need to remember them. We have to remember that sex is not an entitlement. In other words, just because we have a sexual attraction to boys (that we did not choose to have) does not mean that we have the right to pursue a sexual relationship with a boy. That isn’t to say that the sexual relationship in itself is wrong.
Sicko. I’m sorry, but it’s just wrong. The fact that these guys have a code of ethics is just plain weird. How the fuck are these dudes gonna have a code of fuckin ethics? They’re banging little boys for fuck sake! Google had better pull that site, or I’m boycotting.
Rusty at The Jawa Report seems pretty disgusted by this too, rightly so. They’ve got a few other pedophile sites listed also.
The Dread Pundit is wondering why sites with anti-islamist artwork have a warning before you can enter and these boy love sites don’t. He brings up a very good point. I realize Google can’t keep tabs on all these blogs, but come on. If any sites should present warnings before entering, it should be these boy love sites.
Check out the war against NAMBLA too.
Popularity: 7% [?]
They’re banging little boys for fuck sake!
Show me one piece of evidence to back your hysterical claims.
Google had better pull that site, or I’m boycotting
Bloggers who seek to eradicate the extremely controversial views of other Bloggers, instead of just ignoring them? Interesting development. Google is luckily ignoring the lot of you hysterical facists, because it recognizes that not one bit of evidence has been presented to back up these accusations against the Bloggers, that they are “Molesters”, “Rapists” and “Predators” who lure children. Not one bit of evidence. Many Americans claim to cherish freedom. My ass,they do. Like the Islamic militants who demanded the western world shut up and censor it’s press and introduce new laws to prevent certain people sharing their thoughts, certain Americans are demanding something they find personally offensive, be removed off the face of the internet. People like you cannot claim to love freedom of expression. I’d even go further and say you don’t know the meaning of it.
pedophile.
I would imagine that anyone who would agree to the “Code of Ethics” would pretty much not be interested in their group, as it’s also window dressing to rationalize the blog as free speech as opposed to promoting abbhorently criminal behavior.
The blog has now been removed, but we dont’ know if it was Google or the perps who did it.
Thanks for the update Stacy. I don’t really care how it’s gone, I just care that it’s gone.
Some adults have always loved boys
Boylove is a natural human social phenomenon. It has existed through all human history, and is dramatically more common than most people realise. Even today, while some western societies misunderstand and condemn men and women who love boys, there are many societies, cultures, and nations where such feelings are understood, accepted, and even actively promoted for the social benefits they can engender.
Boylove is not child abuse
The vast majority of humans — both heterosexuals and homosexuals — are not abusers of others. Nor are those who love boys. The sad statistical reality in most western societies is that the most prevalent child sexual abuse is the abuse of young girls by heterosexual male adults. The sexual abuse and exploitation of young boys, though it makes the news headlines, is significantly low by comparison.
Boylove is not necessarily sexual
Throughout history, and throughout the world today, adults who love boys have found expression for their feelings by acting as mentors and role models for young males. Though they often cannot openly express the depth of their feelings, many boylovers work in roles focused on helping the young, such as teaching, youth leadership, counselling, and so forth. Doing so does not mean they are looking for special friendships . . . it is simply their natural inclination to work with youngsters. In fact many societies recognise and accept the value of using adults with this focus in those critical development roles.
They make great mentors. They truly love their charges, and their work. The youngsters feel and know this too, and as often as not the boylover in such a role will play an important part in helping the younger person to grow and develop towards healthy and informed maturity.
Boylovers and loved boys are not necessarily homosexual
There is a good deal of confusion over the question of sexuality. A simplistic view of human sexuality divides all humans into either heterosexual or homosexual categories. There may be many more. There are certainly strong indications in research that adults who love boys are often neither especially homosexual nor heterosexual, and thus belong to a sexuality category of their own. Equally, research shows that boys who are in relationships with such adults are also not especially homosexual — in fact statistically the majority are boys who later embrace fully heterosexual lives.
Many psychologists suggest that it is a natural part of a boy’s development before and during puberty to seek an adult male role model who is not a member of their family . . . an outside ‘hero’ figure . . . and that this can include experiment and experience of affectionate and loving feelings in a trusted a safe relationship. It’s long been commonly accepted by psychologists and other developmental professionals that a child’s instinctive sexual interests go through various stages . . . first an interest in their own body and its developing functionality, next in the bodies and sexual functions of others of the same gender, and finally in the sexual potential of the other gender. That appears to be a natural progression. So too, as any adult will remember, is a youngster’s growing desire to experiment and experience.
As for the men in every human society who are instinctively attracted to fulfill those searching developmental needs for boys (whether as mentors or loved persons) there is much evidence to suggest that their feelings are exclusive of any other sexual orientation. Most who identify as boylovers concede they have no other sexual attractions, neither to adult males nor females. Thus the majority are exclusively attracted to younger males. For all practical purposes it works to regard pedosexuality (boylove) as a distinct orientation in itself, and not as a subset of homosexuality.
What boylovers feel
Most people who call themselves boylovers identify as such because a powerful love for boys is overwhelmingly the focus of their emotions and affections, which may also include a component of physical attraction, whether or not they allow themselves to act on that.
Above all, boylovers feel a strong innate admiration and fascination for boys, and an irresistible desire to protect and nurture them. These feelings predominate in their lives to the exclusion of other attractions, just as similar feelings for women or men are undeniably felt by male heterosexuals and homosexuals respectively.
Where there is a sexual component to boylovers’ feelings (and that is not always the case), it remains true that, just as with heterosexuals and homosexuals, this added potential is not felt for every boy they meet — no human is sexually attracted to every person of their preferred type.
For the most part, therefore, boylovers, like all humans, have a particular focus type for their emotional or physical feelings, and find ways to express those feelings within their own social context, and deal with them appropriately when they include sexual attraction.
Ages of boys that attract boylovers
Research with adults who love boys indicates a wide range of ages that different boylovers find attractive.
There are two key research points, however.
One is that very few who identify as boylovers are strongly attracted to boys under the age of seven or over the age of 16. The other is that boylovers who do also feel a clear sexual attraction for boys tend to be attracted sexually to boys in the older range (11 to 16) rather than the younger range (7 to 10). Otherwise, the feelings of attraction these adults have for boys, whatever age appeals individually, are primarily emotional and affectionate feelings . . . the strong desire to nurture, teach, and protect.
This demographic is vastly different with those (mostly men) who have criminally abused boys sexually. Far from being driven by a loving desire to protect, such men exhibit all the characteristic behaviors of socially maladjusted people who use sex as a power tool. These people tend to have no love for their victims, no empathy or identification with them, and little or no remorse for their behavior, but seek morbid satisfaction in the violent domination of a defenceless person.
Terminology
The English language term ‘boylove’ was coined in the last few decades, because in some western societies the technical terminology for this form of orientation or attraction has become vilified in the public mind.
The original technical words are Greek — ‘pedofilia’ (paedophilia) refers to the emotional and affectionate love of youngsters, while ‘pederasty’ refers to the physical love. In certain societies these words have become so negative in their emotive connotations that true pedofiles and pederasts have preferred to call themselves boylovers as a way of distinguishing their orientation from those who abuse children.
The mixed Greek-Latin term ‘pedosexual’ is more clinical, does not carry so much emotive baggage, and clearly indicates a sexual orientation in the same way that the words ‘heterosexual’ and ‘homosexual’ do. Some boylovers use this term to describe themselves. It pays to bear in mind that these words are names for a sexual orientation, and not descriptions of a person’s active life — someone may be heterosexual but celibate. For obvious reasons, in societies where they are misunderstood, that is often the case with pedosexual people.
Come on, anyone with a vendetta against so called ‘internet pedophiles’
needs to get a life. I hope you do boycott, if only so we dont have to listen to you semi coherent ramblings, and hatred against others. Please, Please, find a girlfriend and figure out something constructive to do with your time.
Is that you Arkon!!! lol
There is a difference between being molested and consent. Total difference. I was 16 and dated an older man. Our relationship was great. I miss him. He is no longer around.
How do you know how teenage males feel? You can’t know that. Teenagers do have romantic and sexual feelings towards adults. As for children, I don’t think they do have sexual feelings. If they are forced into it, I feel sad. But when I was young as 12 I knew I was attracted to males. I even think I was before then. Sexual orientation is innate. Nobody knows why. It’s genetic. I know of two brothers who are both gay. They are years apart but they both are gay. Children should be allowed to be sexual at least with other children. Teenagers are young adults on the verge of adulthood. They are very active sexually because hormones rage more during those years. I know a guy who molested little boys and he now serves life sentence. I put him away for a long time. He was a violent and dangerous man. He probably murdered his own mother just so he could molest children.
What’s wrong with having children as friends? They need someone to trust and understand them. Not have sex with them. If I had a child, I would tell him all about life, including the facts of life.
My parents were not shy about nudity around the house. I should know. Half the neighborhood saw my mom without a bra on. Ha.Ha.
It’s the guilt we are taught as children. I played doctor and post office when I was young. It was fun.
You must teach responsibility to children. If they become gay/bi/lesbian/transgender,so what. Love your children. Don’t brainwash them with religious guilt. Respect them and they’ll respect you.
To really put it straight, many “pedophiles” are hypocrites. They preach sin and moral values and end up molesting children.
Yes I was molested by my brother in law. I hated him because not only did he molest me, he molested his own son. That was awful. Like I said there was no consent in that. It happened when I was 13. I just feel there is a difference in love and relationships with sex and just plain molesting. Molestation makes one feel shame and guilt. Yes I have felt that.
There are gays out there who are young who fall in love with older men. Many weren’t molested. I certainly don’t love my brother in law and wasn’t at the time. I despised him even before he molested me and his son.
I cannot imagine sexual acts with children. It’s awful. There also is a difference though in pictures of nude children, which don’t do anything for me. I have seen child pornography once at someone’s house a long time ago and I was very offended and upset. In child pornography there is sexual acts between adults and children.
But in some countries families go in the buff with their children and nothing is said about it because they don’t see it as a sexual thing.
There was and still is a copy of a book which was raided called “Show Me” by William McBride. Very controversial. But the pictures were of naked children playing with one another. That is not child pornography because of the fact is there were no adults having sex with the children and also it was done for an educational purpose about sex and reproduction.
Anyway. Just because one is gay and was molested doesn’t make them child molesters.