http://www.longren.org/2006/02/16/stop-the-aclu-21606-blogburst-part-deux/ Certified & Decorated Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:06:57 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.longren.org/2006/02/16/stop-the-aclu-21606-blogburst-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-17348 Michael L. Wagner Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:46:07 +0000 http://www.longren.org/archives/2123#comment-17348 I'm a pro se appellant in DC Court of Appeals, and my legal actions call for: 1./ a grand jury investigation of Pres. Bush's involvement in the 2000 Florida Pres. Election fraud, quoting the US Commission on Civil Rights report, and 2./ legalization of domestic hemp crops. I've been litigating gov. defendant suits for years now, all to the result of much crime! In fact, Hon Urbina dismissed my Bush complaint with one citation that explicitly upholds the merits of my case!, and with another that the cited Court explicitly decided against!, namely, "The Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to investigate or prosecute," US v. Nixon. The list goes on and on and on. Of course, I've contacted the ACLU and the CA Senators--futilely (of course!!!). I’m a pro se appellant in DC Court of Appeals, and my legal actions call for: 1./ a grand jury investigation of Pres. Bush’s involvement in the 2000 Florida Pres. Election fraud, quoting the US Commission on Civil Rights report, and 2./ legalization of domestic hemp crops.
I’ve been litigating gov. defendant suits for years now, all to the result of much crime!
In fact, Hon Urbina dismissed my Bush complaint with one citation that explicitly upholds the merits of my case!, and with another that the cited Court explicitly decided against!, namely, “The Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to investigate or prosecute,” US v. Nixon.
The list goes on and on and on.
Of course, I’ve contacted the ACLU and the CA Senators–futilely (of course!!!).

]]>