<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USA Today Wordplay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.longren.org/2005/10/27/usa-today-wordplay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.longren.org/2005/10/27/usa-today-wordplay/</link>
	<description>Certified &#38; Decorated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:25:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/2005/10/27/usa-today-wordplay/comment-page-1/#comment-8367</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2058#comment-8367</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;USA Today Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here&lt;/strong&gt;

A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Today Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here</strong></p>
<p>A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/2005/10/27/usa-today-wordplay/comment-page-1/#comment-8336</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 02:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2058#comment-8336</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great Sam!  Thanks for the link and the update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great Sam!  Thanks for the link and the update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/2005/10/27/usa-today-wordplay/comment-page-1/#comment-8329</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2058#comment-8329</guid>
		<description>There is an interesting analysis of the photoshopping at my site that you might be interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an interesting analysis of the photoshopping at my site that you might be interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.longren.org/2005/10/27/usa-today-wordplay/comment-page-1/#comment-8328</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longren.org/?p=2058#comment-8328</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;USA Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here&lt;/strong&gt;

A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>USA Doctored Condi Photo: Answer Here</strong></p>
<p>A huge brouhaha started when Michelle Malkin brought to the attention an obviously doctored photo of Condoleezza Rice. The images in question are as follows: Drudge, a master of headlines, summarizes the situation well: DEMON-EYES-ING CONDI: USA TODAY &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
